K9 - Rust Testing Library
Snapshot testing + better assertions
Available test macros
snapshot
assert_equal
assert_greater_than
assert_greater_than_or_equal
assert_lesser_than
assert_lesser_than_or_equal
assert_matches_regex
assert_err_matches_regex
assert_matches_snapshot
assert_matches_inline_snapshot
assert_ok
assert_err
See https://docs.rs/k9 for API documentation
snapshot!()
macro
Snapshot macro provides the functionality to capture the Debug
representation
of any value and make sure it does not change over time.
If it does change, the test will fail and print the difference between "old" and "new" values.
If the change is expected and valid, running cargo test
with
K9_UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=1
env variable set will automatically take the new value
and insert it into the test source code file as a second argument, after which
all subsequent test runs should start passing again.
assert_equal!()
macro
Rust already provides a good built-in test runner and a set of assertion macros like assert!
and assert_eq!
.
They work great for for quick unit tests, but once the codebase and test suites grows to a certain point it gets
harder and harder to test things and keep tests readable.
For example, when testing that two structs are equal using assert_eq!
macro the output does not provide a lot of help
in understanding why exactly this test failed.
All we get is usually a wall of text collapsed into a single line and you have to find the difference between two structs yourself. Which becomes very time consuming when structs are 10+ fields.
---- eq::test_eq stdout ----
thread 'eq::test_eq' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
left: `Person { name: "Bob", age: 12 }`,
right: `Person { name: "Alice", age: 20 }`: These two must be the same person!', src/eq.rs:13:5
using k9::assert_equal
macro improves this output and prints the difference between two structs:
use assert_equal;
assert_equal!;
Non-equality based assertions
Testing equality is very simple and can definitely work for most of the cases, but one of the disadvantages of only using assert!
and assert_eq!
is the error messages when something fails.
For example, if you're testing that your code produces valid URL
let url = generate_some_url;
assert_eq!;
What you get is
thread 'eq::test_eq3' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
left: `false`,
right: `true`', src/eq.rs:19:5
Which doesn't help much. Especially, if you're new to the code base, seeing things like expected 'true' but got 'false'
will make you go and look at the code before you even know what the problem can be, which can be very time consuming.
What we probably want to see is:
Which gives us enough context on what the problem is and how to fix it without for us having to go and run/debug the test first.